Saturday, February 15, 2020

Managing Radical Changes in an Organization Essay

Managing Radical Changes in an Organization - Essay Example The use of organizational teams by most organizations to implement radical changes has been a core recommendation by most scholars however, the requirements for these teams to be successful in the change implementation are not clear. However, the composition of the change teams and how they are selected, their motivation and influence of engaging with the employees on the need to make changing to the company, are critical to the success of the change implementation. In this study several theories are put in place to identify the strategies that any team carrying out change must observe for it to be successful. Nevertheless, the adoption-innovation theory, and the ability based theory of emotional intelligence proposes that the teams that observe the views of the employees, the team that uses the cognitive style will no fact be successful in the implementation of any form of change. Moreover, the leader of the team has a direct effect on the success of radical change implementation (A ntonakis 2009). ... While there might be several factors behind these failures, there is the underestimation of the quantity of time and the energy required that would create a new organizational culture so that the employees might be accepted and feel this change in the organization. Without employee engaging in any type of change, there is little realization of the profits or the required results. The organizational change is therefore a slow and dynamic process that needs careful planning. The external forces in the present economic and social environment have made many organizations to seek the best ways in which to adapt and implement the changes they need in the organization. Nevertheless, the need to maintain the legitimacy of the company and the need to maintain the viability of the resources (Armenakis 1999). Thus therefore, there is a need to focus on radical change initiatives for the organizations to benefit from any form of change they are about to implement. The radical changes in the mobi le banking industry are often associated with some form of risk and difficult to implement. Change Process Models According to Baron (1997), change is a slow and dynamic process in an organization. It consists of several phases that need to be successive. These he referred successive phases as â€Å"unfreezing, moving, and refreezing† (Barbuto 2006). Several other recent studies have based their ideas on this phase model and come up with related models that aim to show the practical aspect of the implementation of the radical changes by an organization. Baron (1997) asserts that the implementation of the radical changes in an organization is a daunting task and therefore throughout the

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Contribution of rachel carson about elixirs of death Research Paper

Contribution of rachel carson about elixirs of death - Research Paper Example Malaria was a big killer and millions died of it. Swiss scientist Paul Hermann Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1948 for the discovery and use of DDT. Excess of anything is counterproductive. In the case of excessive DDT it was death threatening to both human and animal lives. Its use was banned in the United States in 1972. By 1969, WHO abandoned the eradication efforts of mosquitoes with the use of DDT (Kirsten Weir). Rachel Carson was not the only person responsible for the eradication of DDT. There were several other factors that played vital roles in varying degrees in putting a stop to the use of DDT. In the 1950s, there were various lawsuits by ornithologists, book keepers and concerned citizens who sought court’s injunctions to end DDT spraying. It took quite a while for the courts and the government to act and stop the use of DDT. However, the role of Rachel Carson became the rallying point for the pro and anti DDT users for bouquets and brickbats. Her strategy of writing on a hitherto debatable subject evoked strong emotions on the professional as well as the layman’s side. Even the scientists who did not share her views admired her qualities of penmanship. Actually, DDT was one of the subjects Rachel touched upon in her book Silent Spring. Had she lived longer she would have been pleasantly surprised by the reactions and decisions the booked evoked. Oklahoma Republican Senator Tom Coburn squarely blamed Rachel for the ban on DDT and its supposed disastrous effect on the millions of deaths due to malaria around the globe. Novelist Michael Crichton teamed with Coburn and sounded out the damages accrued due to the ban on DDT in his novel State of Fear (Kirsten Weir). However, the authorities in the judiciary and the government did not wait to check on science’s veracity about the harmlessness of DDT and some other